Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Preferred Finance & Loan Corp. v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1972No. 43604PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice:

This usury case is here because of conflicting decisions previously written by this court. In the 5th paragraph of our syllabus in Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co. (1924), 100 Okl. 105, 228 P. 150, in following an opinion written in 1918 (Bean v. Rumrill, 69 Okl. 300, 172 P. 452, 456), we held :

“It is the uniform policy of the courts not to permit an act forbidden or penalized by statute to be done either directly or indirectly. This court will not uphold any shift or device by which the lender may receive more than 10 per cent per annum for the use or forbearance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. McDougal v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Company v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Rebman v. FLAGSHIP FIRST NAT. BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API