Legal Opinion

Remund v. Liberty Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1934No. 22312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OULLISON, V. O. J.

The Liberty National Bank, as plaintiff, instituted suit against George H. Remund, defendant, seeking to recover on a note in the amount of -$3,348.60, made by defendant in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant answered by denial, and further answer that the indebtedness had been paid; that the original amount of indebtedness to plaintiff was $2,500, in the form of a note due December 15, 1922; that Jack Shroaf was indebted to defendant and Shroaf assumed said debt and orally promised to pay plaintiff and did pay said debt to plaintiff, but plaintiff withheld said information from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Tudor v. American Investment Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Ponca City Bldg. & Loan Co. v. GraffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Jones v. CabanissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Polson v. PirtleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Adair v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API