Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Sycamore Canyon Gravel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1929No. Docket No. 3962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages for the breach of a contract of employment to haul gravel to be used' for the purpose of highway construction.

On June 23, 1925, the respective parties executed a written contract of employment providing in part: “Whereas first party (Sycamore Canyon Gravel Co.) has secured the contract to furnish certain materials to Kuhn Bros, for work on the Whittier Boulevard . . . and is desirous of obtaining the assistance of second party (Morrison) in hauling the same ... it is agreed that second party shall furnish the trucks . . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. TaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Lynch v. Keystone Consol. Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. H. Hackfeld Co., Ltd. v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Howard v. Hancock Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. Woodruff v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Traylor v. Los Angeles Mountain Park Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API