Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1933No. Docket No. 7716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of !$5,074.94, rendered by the court sitting without a jury, in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order entered by another judge of the same court denying a new trial.

Defendant early in 1929 was the owner of a tract of land in the city of Los Angeles which he proposed to subdivide into building lots. He employed plaintiff to level the ground, grade streets within or bordering upon the tract and construct sidewalks and curbs on certain of the streets. The agreement of the parties was reduced to writing and fixed the price to be paid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cox v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Orton v. Embassy Realty Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Hancock v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API