Ross v. Tabor
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in,the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract. At the trial defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted and a judgment of nonsuit entered. From that judgment plaintiff appeals.
The evidence introduced by plaintiff discloses the following : By the terms of their contract, which was in writing and executed December 26, 1914, plaintiff agreed to furnish five hundred or more colonies of bees, which defendant agreed to care for in a workmanlike manner for a period of three years from the date of the agreement. Defendant further agreed to make from the bees thus to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. PenoyarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- May v. Getty.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Cook v. Big Muddy-Carterville Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.