Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Murphy Timber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

This is a suit to compel the defendant to account to plaintiff for alleged profits growing out of their joint performance of a contract, which was entered into between them on February 21, 1917, and which was completely executed on plaintiff’s part on June 30, 1921. Except as hereinafter stated, the contract consisted of a written offer and acceptance, which because of a dispute over its legal effect is set forth at length, and is as follows:

“Portland, Oregon, Feb. 21st, 1917.
“Mr. E. H. Elliott,
“Portland, Oregon.
“Dear Sir: Confirming our verbal understanding regarding the purchase of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hazard v. HazardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1840
  3. Campbell's Gas Burner Co. v. HammerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hallett v. CumstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Salem-Fairfield Telephone Assn. v. McMahanOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Zeibak v. NasserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hagerman v. SchulteIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API