Legal Opinion

Zarate v. Villareal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1913PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Brooks County; W. B. Hopkins, Judge. Trespass to try title by Juan Zarate and others against Antonio Villareal and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit in trespass to try title, instituted by Juan Zarate and Damasio Zarate for themselves individually, and as attorney in fact for 19 others, against Antonio Villareal and 19 others to recover 10,619.23 acres, undivided, out of a tract of land containing about three leagues, situated in Brooks county, Tex., and known as La Alameda, Pilar Zarate y Bayerena original grantee and patentee, and to cancel a certain instrument designated a partition deed.

Plaintiffs alleged the patenting of the La Alameda tract to Pilar Zarate y Bayerena by the state of Texas in 1881, and the recording of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. RunnelsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ballard v. CarmichaelTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Shippers Compress & Warehouse Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Eustis v. City of HenriettaTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Irvine v. GradyTexas Supreme Court · 1892

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Martinez v. GutierrezTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Hicks v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Richardson v. McCloskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Moore v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API