Legal Opinion

Moore v. Kelley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We make the same disposition of the motion to strike the statement of facts and bills of exception in this cause as we made in the cause of Beaver v. Wills, decided December 20, 1913; the grounds of the motion in both causes being the same, except that in the motion in the other cause a ground for suppressing the statement of facts on account of two separate statements, having been presented in that record (one with reference to a plea of privilege and the other with reference to the merits), is not presented in this record for the purpose of suppressing the statement.

The appellee, Kelley, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Armstrong v. O'BrienTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Zarate v. VillarealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Kinsland v. . GrimshaweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Davis v. . RexfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Arce v. Burrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Douglas v. Aztec Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1985
  3. Russell v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Bute v. StickneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Stum v. StumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API