Legal Opinion
Richardson v. McCloskey
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 20, 1924No. 6622PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Substitute Opinion on Motions for Additional Findings of Fact and for Rehearing.
BLAIR, J.
Appellants file a motion for additional findings of fact. This motion should'be granted in part. To explain our findings of fact would necessarily lengthen the opinion, and we have concluded to withdraw the opinion filed herein February 20, 1924, and file this one in lieu thereof, in order to make these corrections.
Appellants, in all capacities sued, file motions for a rehearing; which are hereby overruled. Some of the propositions of law announced in our opinion of February 20, 1924, are also withdrawn,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Chase v. SwayneTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Haward v. PeaveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Platt v. New York & Sea Beach Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Murphy v. SlatonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Wagnon v. WagnonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Richardson v. McCloskeyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- McClure v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.