Ballard v. Carmichael
Texas Supreme Court
Ho statement is necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING.
GAINES, Associate Justice.
This was an action of trespass to •try title, brought by the appellees against the appellants, W. C. Ballard and John Labriere, for the recovery of a tract of 1476 acres of land, patented to the heirs of John F. Morgan. The trial was had before the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs for an undivided interest of seven-twelfths in the land, and for the defendant Labriere for an undivided interest of five-twelfths. All parties complain of the judgment.
We will first dispose of appellants’ assignment of errors.
The original…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- T. & P. R'y Co. v. DurrettTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Hollis v. FrancoisTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Cheek, Guardian v. HerndonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Colman v. W. Va. O. & O. L. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Cullins v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- City of San Antonio v. GrandjeanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Dority v. DorityTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- O. B. Harper D-B-A Harper Electric Co. v. KillionTexas Supreme Court · 1961
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.