Legal Opinion

Livingston County v. Department of Management & Budget

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1988No. 79074, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

This case involves an interpretation of the Solid Waste Management Act and Const 1963, art 9, §29, a provision of the Headlee Amendment, which in part, requires the state to appropriate funds to units of local government for the necessary increased costs associated with "an increase in the level of any activity or service beyond that required by existing law . . . .” The specific question in this case is whether application of the provisions of the Solid Waste Management Act to plaintiff’s sanitary landfill triggers art 9, §29’s state funding requirement. We hold that Const 1963, art 9, § 29…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. White v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. County of Delta v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Mahaffey v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Schmidt v. Department of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API