Durant v. State Board of Education
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We granted leave in these two cases to consider the proper interpretation of specific provisions of the "Headlee Amendment,” Const 1963, art 9, §§ 29, 30, and 32.
In Durant, the Court of Appeals had originally refused to hear a request for mandamus on the ground that plaintiffs (several taxpayers from the Fitzgerald School District and the Fitzgerald Public Schools), by failing to first obtain a decision before the local government claims review board, had not exhausted their administrative remedies. This Court reversed and remanded, ordering the Court of Appeals to hear the case and ruling…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wright v. Council of EmporiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Theophelis v. Lansing General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Livingston County v. Department of Management & BudgetMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.