Durant v. State of Michigan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Today we consider and resolve five questions relating to the Maintenance-of-Support Clause of Const 1963, art 9, § 29,1 part of the “Headlee Amendment”:
*182(1) Are special education and special education transportation state-mandated activities or services within the meaning of art 9, § 29? Yes.(2) Is the “state match” payment for school lunches part of the “state financed proportion” for the purpose of computing compliance with art 9, § 29? Yes.(3) Are payments that are required of the state by art 9, § 29 “funds constitutionally dedicated for specific purposes” and exempt from executive order…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.