Legal Opinion

Durant v. State of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1997No. Docket Nos. 104458, 104459, 104460-104492, Calendar No. 13PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Per curiam

Today we consider and resolve five questions relating to the Maintenance-of-Support Clause of Const 1963, art 9, § 29,1 part of the “Headlee Amendment”:

*182(1) Are special education and special education transportation state-mandated activities or services within the meaning of art 9, § 29? Yes.(2) Is the “state match” payment for school lunches part of the “state financed proportion” for the purpose of computing compliance with art 9, § 29? Yes.(3) Are payments that are required of the state by art 9, § 29 “funds constitutionally dedicated for specific purposes” and exempt from executive order…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API