Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Department of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1992No. 90858, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

The question presented is the proper interpretation of the first sentence of § 29 of the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25-34. The question arises against a backdrop of complex issues including equitable school financing, the intricacies involved in state school aid formulas, and the fiscal problems of the state. These underlying issues shape the arguments of the parties and amicus curiae and color their perspective. However, mindful of the fact that construction of a constitutional provision enacted as a result of voter initiative requires a special emphasis on the *242duty of judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Durant v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Livingston County v. Department of Management & BudgetMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. Kolanek; People v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People of Michigan v. Robert TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. MacOmb County Taxpayers Ass'n v. L'Anse Creuse Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API