Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Keegan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1960No. Docket 52, Calendar 48,397PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This action was brought to recover unpaid compensation for overtime work, an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, and a reasonable attorney’s fee, all under section 16 subd (b) of the fair labor standards act of 1938, as amended.

It was the testimony of plaintiff that between November 17, 1955, and December 31, 1955, he averaged 70 hours per week work (some days working 10, 11, or 12 hours) and, upon occasion, “I have worked around the clock.” During the period from January 1, 1956, to March 31, 1956, he testified, he worked an average of 70 hours per week; from April 1, 1956, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Stimac v. WissmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Ensink v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Berger v. WeberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Godwin v. Ace Iron & Metal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API