Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Dahlberg

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1996No. Docket 176174PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right and plaintiffs cross appeal the trial court’s decision denying defendants’ claim for acceleration of the balance and foreclosure of the land contract between the parties. We affirm.

In 1991, plaintiffs purchased from defendants a resort and laundromat on land contract. The contract provided that plaintiffs would pay $80,000 in cash, with the remaining $145,000 of the purchase price to be paid at eleven percent interest in 120 monthly payments of $1,200 and a balloon payment due on August 1, 2001, for the remaining balance, which would greatly exceed $145,000.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Senters v. Ottawa Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BowerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Stehlik v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Michaels v. Amway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Royce v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Ypsilanti Fire Marshal v. KircherMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. New Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Globe Mortgage Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Webb v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API