Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. Kranitz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 2016No. 2013AP002128-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
2Per curiam
We review, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.33(3), 1 a report filed by Referee James W. Mohr, Jr., recommending that the court reinstate the license of Richard A. Kranitz to practice law in Wisconsin. Upon careful review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Kranitz's license should be reinstated, with the conditions described herein. We agree that Attorney Kranitz should be responsible for the costs of this proceeding, which total $3,142.97.
¶ 2. Attorney Kranitz was licensed to practice law in Wisconsin in 1969. He practiced corporate law in the Milwaukee and Grafton areas. He had…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against GralWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WebsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
4Cited by1 opinion
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016