Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. Kranitz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2014No. 2013AP002128-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. In this disciplinary proceeding, we review a stipulation pursuant to SCR 22.12 1 between the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Richard A. Kranitz. In the stipulation, Attorney Kranitz agrees with the OLR's position that his misconduct that resulted in a federal felony conviction for conspiracy to commit securities fraud warrants the imposition of a two-year suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin.

¶ 2. After fully reviewing the stipulation and the facts of this matter, we accept the stipulation and impose the two-year suspension jointly requested by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven T. BermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings HenningsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API