Lambert v. Cummings
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
Action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment alleged to exist by virtue of proceedings instituted by the council of the town of Berkeley. Defendants had judgment, from which the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. The question is as to whether the resolution of intention was sufficient to give the board jurisdiction to let the contract, order the work done, and assess the property for such work. Section 3 of the street assessment act (Stats. 1891, p. 196, c. 147) provides: “Before ordering any work done or improvement made, which is authorized by section two of this act, the city council…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- San Jose Improvement Co. v. AuzeraisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Grant v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mansur v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Evans v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Burns v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Walsh v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923