Legal Opinion
In Re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 2006No. 00 Civ. 2843(LAK) 00 Civ. 9168, 01 Civ. 6066, 01 Civ. 8171, 01 Civ. 11878, 02 Civ. 1719, 02 Civ. 8395, 03 Civ. 2861, 03 Civ. 2863, 03 Civ. 2864, 03 Civ. 2865, 03 Civ. 2867, 04 Civ. 4916, 04 Civ. 7807, 04 Civ. 8538, 04 Civ. 8539. MDL No. 1348PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Defendants Pfizer, Inc., Warner-Lambert Company, and Parke-Davis (collectively, “Pfizer”) move for an order excluding the proposed opinion testimony of experts in reports submitted by 28 plaintiffs 1 and granting summary judgment dismissing those plaintiffs’ claims. Pfizer argues that the expert reports are not admissible.
I. Background and Undisputed Facts
A. Procedural History
These actions arise from the use of the prescription diabetes medication Rezulin, formerly manufactured by defendants Warner-Lambert Co. and its Parke-Davis division. The drug was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
- Glowczenski v. Taser International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.