Legal Opinion

Ponca City Milling Co. v. Krow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1928No. 18040PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Although in reverse order, for convenience the parties will be herein referred to as they appeared in the trial court; that is, defendants in error will be referred to as plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant.

Plaintiffs filed their action in the district court of Pawnee county, praying damages in the sum of $650 against defendant, alleging that they bought a quantity of seed oats from defendant for planting; that said oats contained Johnson grass seed, from which their land became infested with Johnson grass, and the $650 damages represented the amount it was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Shelby-Downard Asphalt Co. v. EnyartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Coyle and Smith v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Orth v. HajekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alesko v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. McKee v. Producers & Refiners Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. City of Stillwater v. CundiffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Hughes v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API