Legal Opinion

City of Stillwater v. Cundiff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1939No. 28787PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff is the owner of the west half of the northeast quarter of a section of land in Payne county, ' Okla. The defendant has drilled a series of six wells on the southeast quarter of the quarter section so that the six wells are on the 40 acres of land just east of the 80 acres owned by the plaintiff and just across from the south 40 acres of the plaintiff’s land. From these wells the city of Still-water obtained its water supply which was being sold for the consumption of its citizens.

Plaintiff first filed a petition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. ComptonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Canada v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Rouse v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Ponca City Milling Co. v. KrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Schneberger v. Apache Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Keck v. BrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. George v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. ABC Construction Co. of Oklahoma v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API