Legal Opinion

McKee v. Producers & Refiners Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1935No. 23552PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

W. R. McKee (husband of plaintiff in error, in whose name this action was revived) sued the Producers & Refiners Corporation and the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as Producers and Frisco, respectively) to recover, for injury to his land, which he alleged was caused by the defendants in elevating their lands immediately adjoining plaintiff’s land, thereby impounding both their own and plaintiff’s surface waters thereon. At the conclusion of the evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendant Producers on the ground that the question of liability was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Wright v. SchickOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Bruce v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Runyan v. City of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API