Mares v. Janutka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiffs, residents and taxpayers of the city of Montgomery, sued defendant to compel him to restore to the city treasury certain money received by him from sale of merchandise and materials to the city during the time he was a member of its council. Counsel for the parties stipulated the facts, in substance, as follows: That the merchandise so sold by defendant 'to the city “was purchased and delivered on open running account and at fair and reasonable prices, and was used by said city in the exercise of its governmental and corporate functions. That all of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Stone v. BevansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- City of Chaska v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- City of Minneapolis v. CanterburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- City of St. Paul v. Dual Parking Meter Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Thompson v. L. J. Voldahl, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Thompson v. L. J. Voldahl, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971