Legal Opinion
City of St. Paul v. Dual Parking Meter Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1949No. 34,767PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the city.
On March 6,1916, the city council of St. Paul approved specifications for automatic type parking meters to be purchased by and installed for the city. It authorized the city’s purchasing agent to advertise for bids for furnishing and installing 1,070 parking meters, subject to the right of the city to increase the number up to.,15 percent at the same price. Pursuant to this advertisement, bids for automatic type meters were received from defendant, hereinafter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fredericks v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984