Legal Opinion

City of Minneapolis v. Canterbury

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1913No. Nos. 18,036—(144)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,000. The facts are stated in the opinion. The answer denied that defendant was personally interested in tbe sale of property of Sarabi A. Guile to plaintiff city or that defendant profited by such sale-in any manner whatsoever; alleged that he bad no personal interest whatsoever in the purchase of the property from said Guile by plaintiff, and that he profited in no'manner whatsoever thereby, and that the…

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,000. The facts are stated in the opinion. The answer denied that defendant was personally interested in tbe sale of property of Sarabi A. Guile to plaintiff city or that defendant profited by such sale-in any manner whatsoever; alleged that he bad no personal interest whatsoever in the purchase of the property from said Guile by plaintiff, and that he profited in no'manner whatsoever thereby, and that the purchase price paid by the city was for her sole benefit. The-answer further alleged that, at the time defendant purchased…

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new-trial after verdict against him for $3,500.

Prior to January, 1909, and later, the council of the city were concerned in acquiring a site for a fire department repair shop. Its selection was entrusted to a committee of five aldermen. Defendant, who had been chief of the department since 1898, sat with the committee and accoanpanied the members when they were investigating the desirability of sites, which occurred on several occasions. For convenience, a subcommittee of the five was selected to look up a site, of which defendant was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Cheney v. UnroeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Independent School District No. 5 ex rel. Moore v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bay v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Stone v. BevansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. City of Jersey City v. HagueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. The People v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Tarnowski v. ResopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Dose v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API