Legal Opinion

Johnson v. . Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

Both policies of insurance sued on in this action, contain the following stipulations and provisions as required by statute, 0. S., 6437:

“Unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto this company shall not be liable for loss or damage occurring;

Other insurance — (a) while the insured has any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy; or

Increase of hazard — (b) while the hazard is increased by any means within the control or knowledge of the insured; or

Unoccupancy — (f) while the described building whether…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Bank v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Sugg v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Greene v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Black v. Atlantic Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Roberts v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Chavis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Buckner v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. MenkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API