Legal Opinion

Chavis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 138A86PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented by plaintiffs’ appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The trial court’s ruling in defendant’s favor at the close of all the evidence terminated the action on the ground that as a matter of law plaintiffs were precluded from recovering on the fire insurance policy because they had failed to produce their financial records as required by the policy. Consequently, the issue of arson was never submitted to the jury.

The portion of the standard fire insurance policy relevant to a determination…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kisting v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  2. Joseph F. Kisting and Anchor Sales Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. Happy Hank Auction Co. v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DeanMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Happy Hank Auction Co. v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tran v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stover v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1987
  3. Powell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  4. Fineberg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Baker v. Independent Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API