Buckner v. United States Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The question involved: Is the plaintiff mortgagor, in ,an independent action, under mortgagee loss clause, entitled to have the sum of $2,292.45 fire loss paid by defendant Insurance Company to defendant Land Bank, under the policy of insurance in defendant Insurance Company, credited upon his indebtedness of $3,972.33, due as of 1 April, 1935, to defendant Land Bank? We think so, under the facts and circumstances of this case.
The prayer of plaintiff is as follows: “(1) That the defendant U. S. Eire Insurance Company he required to cancel and deliver any agreement it may have entered into by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cunningham v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Bank v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Powell & Powell, Inc. v. Wake Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Insurance Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Home Ins. Co. v. INGOLD TIRE CO., INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953