Legal Opinion

Buckner v. United States Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The question involved: Is the plaintiff mortgagor, in ,an independent action, under mortgagee loss clause, entitled to have the sum of $2,292.45 fire loss paid by defendant Insurance Company to defendant Land Bank, under the policy of insurance in defendant Insurance Company, credited upon his indebtedness of $3,972.33, due as of 1 April, 1935, to defendant Land Bank? We think so, under the facts and circumstances of this case.

The prayer of plaintiff is as follows: “(1) That the defendant U. S. Eire Insurance Company he required to cancel and deliver any agreement it may have entered into by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Bank v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Powell & Powell, Inc. v. Wake Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Insurance Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Employers' Fire Insurance v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. INGOLD TIRE CO., INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API