Legal Opinion

Haldane v. Haldane

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1962No. Civ. 25733, 25885, 26238, 26428PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FILES, J.—

This is a series of appeals taken by defendant from orders made after the entry of the interlocutory judgment in a divorce case. The interlocutory judgment was arrived at under the following circumstances: On July 6, 1960, a group of motions relating to temporary support and child custody came on for hearing before Judge Nix. Both parties were present with their respective attorneys of record. There was a conference in chambers, after which the parties in open court entered into a stipulation respecting the division of property and child custody and support. Alimony and counsel fees…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Heathman v. VantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API