Flynn v. Flynn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an action for divorce. Plaintiff was awarded an interlocutory decree, from which defendant appeals. The judgment was reversed by the district court of appeal of the third district, solely on the ground that there was no express finding that plaintiff had resided in the state or in the county in which the action was brought for the periods specified in section 128 of the Civil Code, that section providing that “a divorce must not be granted unless the plaintiff has been a resident of the state one year, and of the county in which the action is brought three months, next preceding the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coleman v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Bennett v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Kegley v. KegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Kelsey v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.