Friedrich v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
Ollie Friedrich,, appellee, instituted this action, in trespass against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, appellant, and -Harvey Stickler, to recover dam ages for injuries sustained by him while ■ a passenger in the automobile of Harvey Stickler, when the automobile-was struck by one-of appellant’s engines traveling at an excessive rate, of speed and. without having given; warning of. its approach: Atlantic -& -Pacific Tea. .Company, employer of appellee, and Harvey. Stickler, was brought upon the record as an additional defendant. At; the trial of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Minnich v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Perini v. PeriniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Milanovich v. Rochez Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Flynn v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Vietri v. RuggerioSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
- Lewandowski v. Joseph Horne Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.