Legal Opinion

Friedrich v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1948No. Appeal, 110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Ollie Friedrich,, appellee, instituted this action, in trespass against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, appellant, and -Harvey Stickler, to recover dam ages for injuries sustained by him while ■ a passenger in the automobile of Harvey Stickler, when the automobile-was struck by one-of appellant’s engines traveling at an excessive rate, of speed and. without having given; warning of. its approach: Atlantic -& -Pacific Tea. .Company, employer of appellee, and Harvey. Stickler, was brought upon the record as an additional defendant. At; the trial of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Minnich v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perini v. PeriniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Milanovich v. Rochez Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Flynn v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Vietri v. RuggerioSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  5. Lewandowski v. Joseph Horne Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API