Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lewandowski v. Joseph Horne Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1969No. Appeals, Nos. 105 and 106Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

Viewed in the light most favorable to appellants, the evidence shows that on December 14, 1963 at about 2 P.M., appellant Frances Lewandowski, an employee *268of appellee Joseph Horne Company’s store, was told by her immediate supervisor to go to a Mr. Linder’s - office because appellant had customers there. Appellent went to the office and instead of customers found appellee King, an employee of Horne, and appellee Fleishman, an employee of appellee-Dale Systems, Inc., which had been retained by Horne to check on the honesty of Horne employees. King and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cucinotti v. OrtmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Hornak v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Lardieri v. LamontSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Commonwealth v. FromalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Friedrich v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API