Legal Opinion

Ashworth v. Hannum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1943No. Appeal, 122PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This action of trespass was brought by Harry G. Ash-worth, plaintiff, against O. S. Hannum, Wade Cochran, and Adolph Swanson, defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by their negligence. The case was submitted to a jury and verdicts returned in favor of plaintiff against Hannum and Swanson; Cochran was absolved. Hannum and Swanson then made motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. The learned court below granted Swanson’s motion for judgment n. o. v., and refused that of Hannum. The latter’s motion for a new trial,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Sorrentino v. GrazianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Peterson v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. McDonald v. FerrebeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API