Ashworth v. Hannum
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This action of trespass was brought by Harry G. Ash-worth, plaintiff, against O. S. Hannum, Wade Cochran, and Adolph Swanson, defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by their negligence. The case was submitted to a jury and verdicts returned in favor of plaintiff against Hannum and Swanson; Cochran was absolved. Hannum and Swanson then made motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. The learned court below granted Swanson’s motion for judgment n. o. v., and refused that of Hannum. The latter’s motion for a new trial,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Sorrentino v. GrazianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Peterson v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- McDonald v. FerrebeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.