Legal Opinion

Cormican v. Menke

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1931No. Appeals, 283, 284, 285 and 286PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These appeals are from the action of the court below in overruling separate motions by defendants for judgment n. o. v., and entering judgments on the verdict.

The action is in trespass for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, Peter T. Cormican, and for expenses and loss of services sustained by his parents, Martin and Mary Cormican, as the result of a collision between an automobile owned and driven by defendant, John A. Menke, and a truck owned and operated by the codefendant, Miller Quaker City Trucking Company.

These…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Mason v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Serfas v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Hutchinson v. Follmer Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Gaber Et Ux. v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Janeway v. Lafferty Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API