Legal Opinion

Palmer v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1979No. 3651PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

After trial by jury in the district court, John W. Palmer, appellant, was convicted of the crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. See AS 28.35.030. Upon entry of a final judgment he appealed to the superior court where his conviction was affirmed. This appeal followed.

I

Palmer’s first contention is that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence of a videotape recording made at trooper headquarters following his arrest.1 Among other things, the recording portrayed Palmer while a breathalyzer examination was *1108being…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  4. Graham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API