Legal Opinion

State v. Fogle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1969PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendant was convicted of negligent homicide arising out of an automobile accident which resulted *270in the death of a passenger in a vehicle operated by him.

Defendant charges as error the admission into evidence of the result of a chemical' analysis of his breath for alcohol. He argues that he did not voluntarily submit to the chemical test because he was not competent to give such consent. He claims he had the right to refuse the test under, the Implied-Consent Law① and that this implies a voluntary submission. While the statute recognizes that a person may refuse to submit to the test, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Otte v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jones v. City of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. State v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. HeintzOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. American Fork City v. CrosgroveUtah Supreme Court · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API