Legal Opinion

Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1982No. 1 CA-IC 2559PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

The sole issue in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether the administrative law judge erred in denying the petition to reopen while finding that the medical testimony established a pre-existing psychoneurosis which caused the petitioner to “perpetuate her complaints” following a physical industrial injury. We find no error and affirm the award.

Petitioner employee Deborah K. Makinson (petitioner) suffered an injury to her back in an industrial accident on May 31, 1979, while she was working for respondent employer Polypore, Inc. Her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Davila v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Allen v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Capitol Foundry v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dutton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Sun Valley Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API