Legal Opinion
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 22, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1385PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Judge.
Petitioner Capitol Foundry (Capitol Foundry) seeks review of the Industrial Commission’s award granting the petition to reopen of the respondent, Carlos Velas quez (Velasquez), for a new, additional or previously undiscovered disability or condition.
Velasquez sustained an industrial injury on March 18, 1970 when he fell and injured his left arm and hand while dismounting a moving railroad car. A notice of claim status issued by Capitol Foundry on November 30, 1971 terminated medical benefits and temporary compensation as of October 29, 1971. This notice was unpro-tested…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Garrote v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Fischer Packing Co. v. LanhamKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Nelson v. Town of East MillinocketSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.