Dutton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
In this review of an Industrial Commission award denying a reopening, the precise issue is whether it is a defense to reopening that an industrially related con dition and subsequent nonindustrial activity combined to cause a new injury. Because we find that under the facts of this case it is not a defense, the award is set aside.
In a compensable industrial injury in April 1979, the petitioner (claimant) herniated a disc at L4-5. His treating neurosurgeon, Philip Carter, M.D., performed a mi-crodiscectomy and subsequently discharged the claimant with a 10%…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Caganich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- New Pueblo Constructors v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Ramonett v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- East v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Town of Hudson v. WynottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Lou Grubb Chevrolet, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Addington Resources, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.