Legal Opinion

Dutton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 12, 1984No. 1 CA-IC 3003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

In this review of an Industrial Commission award denying a reopening, the precise issue is whether it is a defense to reopening that an industrially related con dition and subsequent nonindustrial activity combined to cause a new injury. Because we find that under the facts of this case it is not a defense, the award is set aside.

In a compensable industrial injury in April 1979, the petitioner (claimant) herniated a disc at L4-5. His treating neurosurgeon, Philip Carter, M.D., performed a mi-crodiscectomy and subsequently discharged the claimant with a 10%…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Caganich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. New Pueblo Constructors v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Ramonett v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. East v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Town of Hudson v. WynottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Lou Grubb Chevrolet, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Addington Resources, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API