Legal Opinion

Barth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1969No. Appeal, No. 227PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit by the owner of a grocery store against an insurer which refused to make payment on an insurance policy.

Appellant, the store owner, testified that he and an agent of the defendant insurance company negotiated a contract of insurance for appellant’s grocery business. They reached an understanding and thereupon the agent filled out a coverage schedule on the back of a sis page foldout brochure detailing the scope of coverage available. As the representations made in the brochure are important to the disposition of this case, a brief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Coastal States Life Insurance v. RaphaelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Mohan v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Providential Life Ins. Co. v. ClemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Smith v. Peacock Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Redmond v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Dobosz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Daniel J. Vogel and Desmia G. Vogel v. American Warranty Home Service Corporation And/or Its Successors, Pioneer Warranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API