Smith v. Peacock Construction Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
Appellant initiated this action by issuing a writ of foreign attachment based on a claim in assumpsit against appellee, Peacock Construction Company, a foreign business corporation, incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia. Appellant originally claimed $37,709.60 with interest, but by an amendment to his complaint this was raised to $44,421.09. Appellee denied the claim and asserted a counterclaim of approximately $15,000. The case was tried before Hon. Charles G. Sweet, President Judge, without a jury, and a decision was rendered in appellant’s favor for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yoo Hoo Bottling Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. LeibowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Ballinger v. Howell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Idell v. FalconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Merion Spring Co. v. Muelles Hnos. Garcia Torres, S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Spatz v. NasconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Barth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- First Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Lukens Construction Co. v. Shar-Mich Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.