Legal Opinion

Smith v. Peacock Construction Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1969No. Appeal, No. 71PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

Appellant initiated this action by issuing a writ of foreign attachment based on a claim in assumpsit against appellee, Peacock Construction Company, a foreign business corporation, incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia. Appellant originally claimed $37,709.60 with interest, but by an amendment to his complaint this was raised to $44,421.09. Appellee denied the claim and asserted a counterclaim of approximately $15,000. The case was tried before Hon. Charles G. Sweet, President Judge, without a jury, and a decision was rendered in appellant’s favor for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yoo Hoo Bottling Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. LeibowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Ballinger v. Howell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Idell v. FalconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merion Spring Co. v. Muelles Hnos. Garcia Torres, S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Spatz v. NasconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Barth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. First Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Lukens Construction Co. v. Shar-Mich Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API