Legal Opinion

Inge v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action for actionable negligence under Federal Employers' Liability Act.

Plaintiff was an employee of defendant as yard conductor at Weldon, and defendant is a common carrier by railroad, engaged in interstate commerce.

The defendant denied any negligence, and set up (1) contributory negligence; (2) assumption of risk.

The material facts, as testified to by plaintiff, on direct-examination, in substance: That he left the engineer and switchman in charge of the switch engine with headlight out and one box-car coupled to it, standing still on pass track, and told the switchman to stay there…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Wilson v. . MassageeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Wilson v. MassageeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Wright v. D. Pender Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Hamilton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API