Legal Opinion
Wilson v. . Massagee
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 13, 1944PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Civil action for recovery of damages for alleged wrongful death, G.S., 28-173, formerly C. S., 160, to which action Shell Oil Company, a corporation, and Southern Railway Company, a corporation, were made parties defendant, without notice, upon motion of original defendants Shirley L. Massagee and Sinclair Refining Company, under G.S., 1-240, formerly C. S., 618, as amended by Public Laws 1929, chapter 68, and on their alleged cross action (1) for exoneration for that the injury of which plaintiff complains was directly and proximately caused by the joint and concurrent negligence of Shell…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Adler's Quality Bakery, Inc. v. Gaseteria, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.