Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Massagee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1944PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WiNBORNE, J.

The question involved on this appeal, as stated in brief of appellants, is this: “Where plaintiff- sues a defendant under G. S., 28-173, alleging that her intestate was killed by the negligence of that defendant, may that defendant join as a joint tort-feasor under G. S., 1-240, a railway company by which the plaintiff’s intestate was employed in interstate commerce?”

The court below answered in the negative, and we are of opinion that the answer finds support in law.

The question as stated presupposes, and rightly so from the pleadings, Renn v. R. R., 170 N. C., 128, 86 S. E.,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API