Muhammad v. Carlson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Imam ’Shahid Muhammad (“Muhammad”), a prisoner at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri (“MCFP”), appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se complaint, arguing that medical regulations governing his placement in the AIDS2 unit at MCFP endowed him with a “liberty interest” under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. Because we believe that Muhammad asserts an interest too insubstantial to trigger due process protection, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of his complaint.
I. BACKGROUND.
Muhammad, a prisoner at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Tellier v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Jeffrey Tokar v. Bill Armontrout Robert Drennen Myrna E. TrickeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- MacLean v. SecorDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.