Legal Opinion
MacLean v. Secor
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 14, 1995No. Civ.A. 93-2383PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, through appointed counsel, brings this action pursuant to the doctrine announced in the Supreme Court’s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging that defendants, two correctional officers at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) — Schuylkill, violated his constitutional rights while he was an inmate there. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendants violated his Fifth Amendment and Eighth Amendment rights by verbally threatening him (Counts I…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Lewis v. WetzelDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Tellier v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Burgos v. CaninoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Tellier v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Burgos v. CaninoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.