Legal Opinion
H. W. Ariens v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 29, 1967No. 17205_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, Circuit Judge.
The question is whether plaintiffs-appellants, employees of Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation, are entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., 1 for sleeping time which they were required to spend on the employer’s premises in the course of their employment.
The defendant contends that it comes within a saving clause of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 259, which relieves an employer from liability for overtime compensation when it is shown that failure to pay for overtime was “in good faith in conformity with and in reliance on” a written…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Rokey v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Bridgeman v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Randolph Johnson, Jr. v. City of Columbia, South Carolina, Randolph Johnson, Jr. v. The City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Monzon v. Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Charlene Brigham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Brigham Carl Hall Gary Millsap Donald E. Reed v. Eugene Water & Electric BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Alvin S. Bodie v. The City of Columbia, South Carolina, Secretary of Labor, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.