Legal Opinion

Beresford Independent School District v. Toomey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1937No. File No. 8002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This proceeding was commenced toy the plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of sections 3026-3028, inclusive, of the Revised 'Code of 1919, and acts amendatory thereto, for the purpose of obtaining judgment of the court determining the issues in controversy between the parties hereto. A stipulation of facts was entered into toy the parties which in substance is as follows:

That the plaintiff is-a public corporation organized as an independent school district; that the -defendant -is the duly elected, qualified, and acting superintendent of schools in and for Union county, South Dakota, having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of De LuccaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. White v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. QuinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. QuinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API