Legal Opinion

White v. Clarke

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1896No. S. F. No. 224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. 0. W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This proceeding purports to have been instituted in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, under section 1138 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the purpose of obtaining a judg*426ment of the court upon an agreed case. The document upon which the judgment was sought is prefaced by the statement: “ The plaintiff and the defendant agree to submit this controversy without action, and present the following facts”; and, after setting forth certain facts, concludes: “ Wherefore, the plaintiff, as well as the defendant, agrees to submit this controversy, without action, upon the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodrum v. BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  2. Beresford Independent School District v. ToomeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Stoddard v. William A. Davis Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. County of Todd v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Haakon County v. Brunswick Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API